Understanding Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) and Its Role in SEO

For nearly two decades, the concept of Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) and “LSI keywords” has been widely discussed within SEO circles. Some have claimed that Google relies *heavily* on “LSI keywords” to understand the content of a webpage. While the discussion continues, the reality is clear and well-documented.

What is Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI)?

Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), or Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), is a technique used to analyze a set of documents to uncover the statistical relationships between words that appear *together*. These relationships provide *valuable* insights into the topics and meanings of the words within the documents.

LSI addresses two primary challenges in language: synonymy and polysemy.

  • Synonymy refers to the problem of multiple words having the same meaning. For example, searching for “pancake recipe” is essentially the same as searching for “flapjack recipe” (known as *jianbing* in Northern China, with regional variations in the South), as both terms describe the same dish.
  • Polysemy refers to the situation where a word has multiple meanings. Take the word “jaguar,” for example—it could refer to an animal, a car, or even a football team. LSI helps determine the correct meaning by analyzing the words that appear alongside it. If the word “jaguar” is mentioned in conjunction with “Jacksonville,” LSI would infer that it most likely refers to the football team.

By understanding how words are used together, LSI can enable more accurate search results and content matching.

LSI: An Old Technology

The patent for Latent Semantic Indexing was filed in September 1988, before the internet as we know it today even existed. While LSI was a significant advancement at the time, it’s important to remember that it is not a new or cutting-edge technology. In fact, it predates the internet by several years.

Back in 1988, LSI *pioneered* text-matching technology, but today, it is far from the cutting edge of information retrieval.

Just as computers from the late 80s are *already* outdated, LSI is outdated as a solution for today’s complex data analysis.

LSI’s Limitations on the Web

One major limitation of using Latent Semantic Indexing across the entire web is the complexity of recalculating the statistical analysis each time a new webpage is published or indexed. A 2003 research paper on using LSI for spam detection discussed this issue. The paper highlighted that LSI does not support dynamically adding new documents without recomputing the entire semantic set. Any update to a word’s relationship with other words requires adjusting all other word vectors, which is *extremely* computationally expensive and time-consuming.

These limitations make LSI an impractical solution for modern search engines like Google, where new content is constantly being indexed and searched.

LSI and SEO: A Misconception

Despite *popular belief*, LSI is not the silver bullet that many SEO experts believe it to be. While LSI’s approach to analyzing words and their relationships may have been valuable at some point in the past, today’s search engines use far more sophisticated algorithms to process language and understand content.

It’s crucial for SEO professionals to understand these realities, especially when *navigating* the complex landscape of modern search engines and content optimization.

At Art SEO, we focus on leveraging the latest strategies and insights to help your website rank higher and succeed in today’s competitive digital world. Our expertise includes mastering SEO.

Are There Research Papers on Google LSI Keywords?

In the search community, some individuals suggest that Google still relies on “LSI keywords” as part of its search algorithm, as if Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) were still cutting-edge technology. To support this view, some point to a 2016 research paper titled Improving Semantic Topic Clustering for Search Queries with Word Co-occurrence and Bigraph Co-clustering (PDF). However, this paper is not an example of Latent Semantic Indexing. In fact, it’s a completely different approach.

The paper cites a 1999 LSI research paper, Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing by T. Hofmann, to explain why LSI is unsuitable for the problem they are addressing. It specifically states that techniques such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (PLSA) are more effective at uncovering hidden latent topics in text. These methods learn patterns based on the co-occurrence of words in documents, and they address the challenges posed by sparse data—especially in short text formats like search queries, tweets, or instant messages.

Why This Study *Isn’t* About LSI: This paper isn’t about analyzing web pages or using LSI for semantic indexing. Instead, it explores using data mining techniques to decode short, ambiguous search queries. Therefore, relying on this study as evidence that Google still uses LSI keywords is misleading.

Does Google Use LSI Keywords?

When it comes to search engine marketing, there are two reliable and trustworthy sources of information:

  1. Factual knowledge from public sources, such as research papers or patents.
  2. Insights from Google employees, which often shed light on how the search algorithm works.

Anything beyond that is just speculation.

As for LSI keywords, Google’s John Mueller has explicitly debunked this myth:
“There’s no such thing as LSI keywords — anyone who’s telling you that is wrong, don’t believe them.” — 🍌 John 🍌 (@JohnMu) (Note: The original tweet included a banana emoji).

Bill Slawski, a renowned authority on search patents with a deep understanding of Google’s algorithms, has also firmly refuted the concept of LSI.

In summary, Google’s ranking algorithm is not driven by LSI keywords. This claim is simply untrue. The technologies Google actually uses include more advanced methods, such as BERT and neural matching, which help the search engine better understand the context and meaning of search queries.

At Art SEO, we focus on the latest search technologies and strategies that truly impact rankings, discarding outdated theories.

markdown Latent Semantic Indexing

Bill Slawski Discusses Latent Semantic Indexing

In a tweet on August 18, 2020, Bill Slawski made it clear that Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) has no real connection to SEO. He explained that the technologies and processes behind the concepts associated with LSI are different, making LSI irrelevant to current SEO practices. According to Bill, these terms are not actually “latent” in nature and operate on principles different from LSI.

Why Google Is Associated with Latent Semantic Analysis

Despite the lack of concrete evidence that Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) or Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) is associated with Google’s ranking algorithm, the search giant is still closely associated with these terms. This association stems from Google’s acquisition of Applied Semantics in 2003, a company that developed a semantic analysis technology called Circa (a semantic analysis product).

As highlighted in Google’s press release at the time, Applied Semantics’ technology helped AdSense function and played a key role in how Google understood content and served ads. Circa’s ability to understand and organize online information in a manner resembling human thought was central to this development. Google co-founder Sergey Brin said that the acquisition would help Google develop new technologies to improve the online advertising experience for users, publishers, and advertisers.

“Applied Semantics is a recognized innovation leader in semantic text processing and online advertising,” said Sergey Brin. The technology not only helped serve targeted ads, but also enabled Google to gain a deeper understanding of web pages, making their ads more relevant.

The Rise of Semantic Analysis in SEO

In the early 2000s, “semantic analysis” was a buzzword, thanks in large part to the success of Ask Jeeves’ semantic search technology. As Google acquired Applied Semantics, this idea gained traction. Despite the lack of evidence directly linking LSI or LSA to Google’s ranking system, the search marketing community began to speculate about the potential role of LSI in the ranking algorithm.

By 2005, some SEO experts began to suggest that Google’s algorithm had changed and might now place more emphasis on LSI. This idea stemmed from Google’s acquisition of Applied Semantics and its move to apply the technology in AdSense. SEO experts speculated that Google might have been leveraging Latent Semantic Indexing to refine ad serving, and they correlated this with observed shifts in website rankings.

Debunking the LSI SEO Myth

The hype surrounding terms like ‘semantic analysis’ and ‘semantic search’ contributed to the widespread belief that Google’s algorithm uses LSI keywords.

In reality, Latent Semantic Indexing is an old technology, patented in 1988, long before the rapid expansion of the Internet. Its design and purpose restrict its applicability in modern search engines, especially on the scale of Google’s operations. No reliable research or papers suggest that LSI plays a direct role in Google’s ranking algorithm.

In conclusion, while the rise of semantic technology and Google’s acquisition of Applied Semantics sparked widespread speculation about LSI’s impact on SEO, the facts do not support the view that LSI is a Google ranking factor. The SEO community’s focus on LSI arises more from the similarity of terms and concepts than from any concrete connection between LSI and Google’s algorithm.

Google Search Ranking: The Truth About LSI Keywords

The concept of LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing) has been a topic of discussion since the early 2000s, especially after Google acquired Applied Semantics in 2003—the developer of the AdSense contextual advertising tool.

However, despite the rumors, Google has explicitly clarified multiple times that it does not use LSI keywords in its algorithm.

To be clear: LSI keywords do not exist, not as commonly perceived. For those who still have doubts, it is necessary to emphasize again: this concept is purely fictional.

In light of the overwhelming evidence on the matter, it is safe to say that the concept of LSI keywords is simply incorrect. The facts show that LSI does not play any significant role in Google’s ranking algorithm.

When we consider the latest breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, natural language processing, and Google’s BERT model, the idea that LSI is still a key ranking factor is completely outdated and, frankly, hard to believe.

Additional Resources: